Second Chances: How Forgiveness Rebuilds Trust in Relationships
- Dawna Peterson
- May 3
- 4 min read
"After these things Jesus showed himself again to the disciples by the Sea of Tiberias... When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, 'Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?'" - John 21:1, 15
The Shore of Second Chances
In the quiet dawn by the Sea of Tiberias, we witness one of the most profound restoration stories ever told. Peter, who had denied Jesus three times, faces his resurrected Lord. Instead of condemnation, he finds a carefully prepared breakfast and an opportunity for renewal.
This scene offers us a powerful framework for understanding how broken trust can be restored in marriages.
Betrayal occurs when our spouse deeply violates their partner's trust and can lead to significant psychological distress, including trauma, grief, anger, and damaged self-esteem. Often when we imagine betrayal in a marriage, we think immediately of sexual adultery. But marriages can be wounded as badly, or worse, whenever one spouse manipulates or gaslights their spouse, publicly disrespects them, discloses confidential information about them, or exhibits frightening, over-the-top wrath.
When trust is broken, partners experience what neuroscientists call "social pain." FMRI studies show that relationship injuries activate the same brain regions as physical pain, making betrayal literally hurt. This explains why betrayed partners often describe feeling "wounded" or "crushed."
As a marriage counselor, Dawna has witnessed countless couples standing on their own shores of broken trust—whether from infidelity, broken promises, financial deception, or accumulated small betrayals. The good news--from science as well as scripture -- is that relationships can heal, often emerging stronger through the process of genuine forgiveness.
Three Questions, Three Stages of Healing
Jesus' interaction with Peter offers a profound parallel to the evidence-based forgiveness process developed by relationship researchers. Notice how Jesus asks Peter the same question three times, each representing a deeper level of restoration:
Recognition - "Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?" The first stage of healing requires acknowledging what happened. Like Jesus directly addressing Peter's betrayal, couples must create space to recognize the breach of trust. Dr. Shirley Glass, known as "the godmother of infidelity research," found that couples who successfully heal from affairs first establish a clear understanding of what occurred.
Empathy - "Simon son of John, do you love me?" The second question invites Peter to move beyond shame into authentic reconnection. Similarly, Dr. Sue Johnson's Emotionally Focused Therapy shows that healing requires accessing the vulnerable emotions beneath the breach. The hurt partner must express their pain, while the offending partner demonstrates empathy rather than defensiveness.
Recommitment - "Simon son of John, do you love me?" With the third question, Jesus invites Peter into a renewed commitment. Peter responds with vulnerability: "Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you." This transparency mirrors what Dr. John Gottman calls "the transparency effect"—couples who heal from betrayal establish new patterns of radical honesty.
From Past Pain to Future Purpose
Notice that after each of Peter's responses, Jesus doesn't just offer forgiveness—he gives Peter direction: "Feed my lambs," "Tend my sheep," "Feed my sheep." This progression reveals a crucial truth about relationship healing: genuine forgiveness isn't just about processing the past but creating a new future.
You cannot simply reset a relationship after a significant betrayal. Instead, successful couples must build what some therapists call a "relationship 2.0"—one that addresses the vulnerabilities that contributed to the breach while establishing new patterns of connection.
The Shared Meal as Reconciliation
It's significant that Jesus prepares breakfast before the restoration conversation. This echoes findings from The Gottman Institute that physical comfort must precede emotional processing. Creating a space of safety—what therapists call "containment"—allows for the vulnerability required in healing conversations.
Practical Application: The Three-Conversation Model
Based on this biblical narrative and current research, we recommend a three-conversation approach for couples rebuilding trust:
The Recognition Conversation
The hurt partner shares their experience without interruption
The offending partner acknowledges specific actions and their impact
Both identify patterns that contributed to vulnerability
The Empathy Conversation
The hurt partner expresses underlying emotions (fear, abandonment, etc.)
The offending partner responds with empathy, not defensiveness
Both connect current reactions to attachment history
The Recommitment Conversation
Develop specific agreements about future behavior
Create accountability structures that rebuild safety
Establish a shared vision for relationship renewal
This approach integrates elements from both Worthington's REACH forgiveness model and Gordon, Baucom, and Snyder's three-stage model for treating infidelity.
Resurrection in Relationships
The story by the Sea of Tiberias reminds us that betrayal need not be the end of a relationship. Just as Peter went on to become a foundational leader despite his failure, couples can experience what researchers call "post-traumatic growth"—emerging stronger and more intimately connected through the process of healing.
The journey requires courage from both partners: courage to acknowledge pain, courage to take responsibility, and courage to risk vulnerability again. But for those willing to walk through this process, there awaits not just restoration but transformation—a relationship deepened through the very challenges that could have destroyed it.
If you're currently walking through a trust breach in your relationship, consider reaching out for professional support. Research shows that couples who heal successfully often benefit from skilled guidance through this complex emotional terrain.

Comentários